Seed Round Investing: Form D, Risk Disclosures and the PPM

Andrew Thompson • September 29, 2023

The Importance of Securities Compliance in Early Stage Fundraising

Securities Compliance — Dallas, TX — Landmark Advisors LLC

The quick response is that it depends, but generally speaking, it is advised and occasionally necessary. Look a little closer.


What is a PPM?


Let's first talk about what a PPM is. A PPM is a document that provides details about the business looking to raise money from investors. It resembles a business plan in several respects, but it has extensive modifications for securities legislation clauses, investment risk elements, and suggested terms of investment. PPMs are referred to by several names, such as offering memorandums and confidential information memorandums (CIMs).


To comprehend the usage of PPMs and when they are appropriate, one must have a fundamental understanding of securities legislation. A firm, commonly referred to as an "issuer," is not allowed to sell securities (such as stocks and other types of debt) unless the offering is registered or meets an exemption from registration requirements under federal and state law. It is important for an issuer to meet an exemption since it is costly and not appropriate for the majority of enterprises to register a securities offering.


The esoteric nuances of the law point us to the Securities Act of 1933's Section 4(a)(2) as the most widely used exception to registration of securities. For deals that don't include a "public offering," it offers an exception. That text of the law may not seem, well really isn’t, particularly helpful at first glance. 


Nonetheless, the SEC has offered a number of safe havens for the "public offering" requirement. If your offering satisfies one of the safe-harbor requirements, it has fulfilled an exception and complies with Section 4(a)(2) and does need require registration with the SEC. But exemption from registration does not impute exemption from filing, nor exemption from state law documentation requirements.


Two of the most popular safe harbors are described here, along with recommendations on when using a PPM is suggested.


504 Safe Harbor Regulation


An issuer may sell up to $5 million worth of securities over any given 12-month period according to Rule 504. Accredited and non-accredited investors may participate in the offering, but the issuer may not use any kind of “general solicitation”. Rule 504 does not supersede state securities laws, in contrast to Rule 506. As a result, an issuer must verify that a state exemption is met in each state where an investor resides. Rule 504 is frequently the preferred exemption if the issuer intends to sell securities to non-accredited investors because it does not demand that certain particular information (such as audited financials) be given to non-accredited investors.


Safe Harbor Rule 506(b)


Because Rule 506(b) eliminates the requirement for an issuer to satisfy a state securities registration exemption in each state where an investor resides, it has historically been the most frequently used securities registration exemption. An issuer may sell as many securities as they want to accredited investors and as many as 35 securities to non-accredited investors under Rule 506(b). Sourcing in general is prohibited.  Rule 506(b) allows issuers to sell to non-accredited investors, however because of the onerous disclosure requirements, i.e. the dissemination of audited financial statements, it is often best to steer clear of non-accredited investors.


When a PPM is Needed


If the issuer is onboarding non-accredited investors under Rule 506(b)—note that Rule 506(b) is generally not encouraged for non-accredited investors—a PPM is necessary. In theory, Rule 506(b) offerings to accredited investors alone and Rule 504 offerings to both accredited and non-accredited investors will not trigger the need for a PPM.


Even in situations when it is not technically necessary, a PPM is frequently advised. The PPM should be regarded by the issuer as a kind of insurance. It does not totally insulate you from liability, but it does provide a significant layer of protection. When the PPM is properly and thoughtfully drafted, it guarantees that every investor receives written notice of all relevant information about the issuer.


This is a great defense against future investor lawsuits, especially if the investment does not perform as expected and if the investors are not close friends or relatives of the issuer (i.e., more inclined to sue). PPMs are fairly standard in some industries: small manufacturing, real estate (syndications), restaurants and food service, some tech, entertainment and film, any places where the field of investors becomes fairly widespread in the earliest stages of fundraising. 


Securities law presents tricky waters for you to navigate. You are well advised to seek experienced advisory council through groups like Landmark Advisors. As soon as you are seriously contemplating raising seed capital, contact us to schedule an appointment.


By Admin March 22, 2025
Hernia mesh, a medical device used to repair hernias, has been associated with serious complications, causing significant pain and suffering for many individuals. If you or a loved one in Indiana has experienced adverse effects from hernia mesh, understanding your legal rights is crucial. This post explores the legal avenues available to those affected by hernia mesh complications in the Hoosier State. The Risks Associated with Hernia Mesh While designed to strengthen hernia repairs, certain hernia mesh products have been linked to: Infections: Mesh can become infected, leading to pain, swelling, and further complications. Chronic Pain: Many patients experience persistent pain after mesh implantation. Mesh Migration: The mesh can shift from its original position, causing damage to surrounding tissues and organs. Adhesions: The mesh can adhere to nearby organs, leading to complications and the need for corrective surgery. Mesh Failure: The mesh may fail to provide adequate support, resulting in hernia recurrence. Indiana Product Liability Law and Hernia Mesh Claims In Indiana, product liability law allows individuals to hold manufacturers accountable for defective medical devices. To pursue a hernia mesh claim, you must establish: Defective Design or Manufacturing: That the mesh was defectively designed or manufactured. Failure to Warn: That the manufacturer failed to adequately warn about the risks of complications. Causation: A direct link between the defective mesh and your injuries. Damages: The extent of your injuries and losses. Steps to Take for a Hernia Mesh Claim in Indiana Consult an Indiana Medical Device Attorney: Seek legal counsel from an attorney experienced in medical device litigation. Gather Medical Records: Collect all relevant medical records, including surgical reports, diagnoses, and treatment plans. Document Your Symptoms: Keep a detailed record of your symptoms and how they have impacted your life. Understand Indiana’s Statute of Limitations:
By Admin March 22, 2025
Roundup, a widely used herbicide containing glyphosate, has faced increasing scrutiny due to its potential link to cancer and other health issues. For Indiana residents who have been exposed to Roundup and suffered adverse effects, understanding your legal rights is essential. This post explores the legal avenues available to those affected by Roundup and other weedkillers in the Hoosier State. The Risks Associated with Roundup and Glyphosate Roundup's active ingredient, glyphosate, has been classified as "probably carcinogenic to humans" by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). 1 Exposure to glyphosate has been linked to: 1. www.abrinternationaljournal.org www.abrinternationaljournal.org Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Studies have shown a potential association between glyphosate exposure and an increased risk of this cancer. Kidney and Liver Damage: Long-term exposure may lead to damage to these vital organs. Reproductive Issues: Some research suggests potential impacts on reproductive health. Indiana Product Liability Law and Roundup Claims In Indiana, product liability law allows individuals to hold manufacturers accountable for defective products. To pursue a Roundup claim, you must establish: Defective Design or Failure to Warn: That the manufacturer failed to adequately warn users about the risks of glyphosate exposure. Causation: A direct link between your exposure to Roundup and your cancer or other health issues. Damages: The extent of your injuries and losses.
By Admin March 22, 2025
Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) like Nexium and Prilosec have provided relief for millions suffering from acid reflux and related conditions. However, growing concerns about their long-term safety have surfaced, particularly regarding potential links to serious health issues. If you or a loved one in Indiana has experienced adverse effects from these medications, understanding your legal rights is crucial. This post aims to guide you through the complexities of Nexium and Prilosec claims within the Hoosier State. The Risks Associated with Nexium and Prilosec Nexium (esomeprazole) and Prilosec (omeprazole) work by reducing stomach acid production. While effective for short-term relief, prolonged use has been associated with several health risks: Kidney Disease: Studies suggest a potential link between long-term PPI use and chronic kidney disease, including kidney failure. Bone Fractures: PPIs can interfere with calcium absorption, increasing the risk of osteoporosis and fractures, particularly in older adults. Stomach Cancer: Some research indicates a possible association between prolonged PPI use and an increased risk of gastric cancer. Nutrient Deficiencies: Long-term use can lead to deficiencies in essential nutrients like magnesium and vitamin B12. Indiana Product Liability Law and PPI Claims In Indiana, product liability law holds manufacturers accountable for defective products that cause harm. To pursue a claim related to Nexium or Prilosec, you must demonstrate: Defective Design or Failure to Warn: That the manufacturer knew or should have known about the risks and failed to provide adequate warnings. Causation: A direct link between your use of the medication and your subsequent health issues. Damages: The extent of your injuries, including medical expenses, lost income, and pain and suffering.
More Posts